Long-term care insurance without the lifetime bill.

With traditional long-term care insurance, not only are premiums high, they are expected to be paid for life.

What’s more, if you don’t end up using the insurance, the money you put into the policy – often decades of premiums – will be lost.

But there’s good news!

Hybrid long-term care insurance is an alternative to traditional long-term care insurance that combines an underlying life insurance policy or annuity with riders to cover long-term care expenses.

Click here for a FREE Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance.

    • Single premium or fixed-pay options, such as ’10-year’ pay.
    • Heirs get money back if you don’t need care.
    • Over 59-1/2, buy with your IRA.
    • Simple, easy solution!

How it works…

    • Hybrid long-term care insurance protects against long-term care expenses while simultaneously protecting insureds from the burden of a lifetime of premiums.
    • If long-term care benefits are never needed, either the death benefit of the life insurance policy or the accumulated funds of the annuity can be left to heirs.

Simple. Easy. Problem solved!

No nagging premiums to pay until you are in your nineties or older. Plus, if you never need care, heirs get money back instead of getting nothing.

Imagine  long-term care insurance without the never ending bill and money back for your family if you don’t end up needing care.

Find out today what hybrid long-term care insurance can do for you!

Click for your FREE Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance.

No cost or obligation and no salesperson will call!

 

You paid off your home. Now pay off your long-term care insurance!

Most people agree that a paid off a home is a cornerstone of retirement security.

But what if you pay off your home for retirement and a new bill lands in your lap in the form of unending long-term care insurance premiums?

With traditional long-term care insurance, not only are the premiums high, they are expected to be paid for life.

Click here for a FREE Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance!

    • Long-term care insurance without the lifetime bill.
    • Heirs receive money back if you don’t need care.
    • Over 59-1/2 buy with your IRA.
    • Simple, easy solution!

What’s more, if you don’t end up using the insurance, the money you put into the policy – often decades of costly premiums – will be lost.

But there is good news!

There is a way to solve for both the lifetime bill and the risk of losing all your premiums should you never end up needing long-term care.

If you are over the age of 59-1/2, it may even be possible for you to buy and “pay off” your long-term care insurance using funds from your IRA.

How it works…

This strategy requires the use of a hybrid long-term care insurance policy.

Hybrid long-term care insurance is an alternative to traditional long-term care insurance that combines an underlying life insurance policy or annuity with riders to cover long-term care expenses.

    • Hybrid long-term care insurance protects against long-term care expenses while simultaneously protecting insureds from the burden of a lifetime of premiums.
    • If long-term care benefits are never needed, either the death benefit of the life insurance policy or the accumulated funds of the annuity can be left to heirs.

5 Easy Steps to Pay Off Your Long-Term Care Insurance.

At least one insurer has a program where annual premium withdrawals for hybrid long-term care insurance are coordinated through an IRA account.

Step 1. An individual or both spouses are covered by one policy.

Step 2. A portion of IRA account funds are “rolled over” tax-free into a qualified ten-year-certain deferred annuity.

Step 3. Each year for ten years, funds are dispersed from the annuity to pay the annual premium on a 10-year-pay hybrid long-term care policy.

Step 4. Annually, the policyholder receives notification of the reportable income amount for taxes.

Step 5. Once the ten years are up, the deferred annuity will be depleted, and no additional hybrid long-term care premiums will be due.

Simple. Easy. Problem solved. 

No nagging premiums to pay until you are in your nineties or older. Plus, if you never need care, heirs get money back instead of getting nothing.

When I explained how hybrid policies work to my wife – who saw her father pay costly long-term care premiums for years before passing away without ever receiving a dime in benefits, she said,

“Why would anyone do this any other way?”

Want to see what hybrid long-term care might look like for you? 

If so, there is no cost or obligation to find out.

Click here for a FREE guide to Hybrid Long-term Care Insurance.

Questions or comments?

Contact me at this link,  and I will reply to you via email.

Thanks for reading and best wishes for your retirement!

How to buy long-term care insurance with an IRA.

If you are over the age of 59-1/2, it may be possible for you to buy and “pay off” your long-term care insurance with funds from your IRA.

How it works.

This approach requires the use of a hybrid long-term care insurance policy.

Hybrid long-term care insurance is an alternative to traditional long-term care insurance that combines an underlying life insurance policy or annuity with riders to cover long-term care expenses.

    • Hybrid long-term care insurance protects against long-term care expenses while simultaneously protecting insureds from the burden of a lifetime of premiums.
    • If long-term care benefits are never needed, either the death benefit of the life insurance policy or the accumulated funds of the annuity can be left to heirs.

By contrast, with traditional long-term care insurance – premiums are due for life and if care is never needed, years of costly premiums paid into the policy will be lost.

5 easy steps to buy long-term care insurance with an IRA.

At least one insurer has a program through which periodic annual premium withdrawals for hybrid long-term care insurance are coordinated through an IRA account.

Step 1. An individual or both spouses are covered by one policy.

Step 2. A portion of IRA account funds are “rolled over” tax-free into a qualified ten-year-certain deferred annuity.

Step 3. Each year for ten years, funds are dispersed from the annuity to pay the annual premium on a 10-year-pay hybrid long-term care policy.

Step 4. Annually, the policyholder receives notification of the reportable income amount for taxes.

Step 5. Once the ten years are up, the deferred annuity will be depleted, and no additional hybrid long-term care premiums will be due.

For older retirees, annual withdrawals used to pay premiums can help meet required minimum distributions (RMDs).

Lower annual withdrawals spread out over ten years generally creates a reduced tax impact when compared to making a large, one-time withdrawal to fund a single-premium or lump-sum policy.

Learn more about hybrid long-term care insurance and how to “pay off” your long-term care policy in this FREE guide! 

Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance*

*Direct link – no email or phone number required and no salesperson will call.

5 Easy Steps to Pay Off Your Long-Term Care Insurance

If you are over the age of 59-1/2, it may be possible for you to buy and “pay off” your long-term care insurance with funds from your IRA.

How it works.

This approach requires the use of a hybrid long-term care insurance policy.

Hybrid long-term care insurance is an alternative to traditional long-term care insurance that combines an underlying life insurance policy or annuity with riders to cover long-term care expenses.

    • Hybrid long-term care insurance protects against long-term care expenses while simultaneously protecting insureds from the burden of a lifetime of premiums.
    • If long-term care benefits are never needed, either the death benefit of the life insurance policy or the accumulated funds of the annuity can be left to heirs.

By contrast, with traditional long-term care insurance – premiums are due for life and if care is never needed, years of costly premiums paid into the policy are lost.

5 Easy Steps to Pay Off Your Long-Term Care Insurance.

At least one insurer has a program through which periodic annual premium withdrawals for hybrid long-term care insurance are coordinated through an IRA account.

Step 1. An individual or both spouses are covered by one policy.

Step 2. A portion of IRA account funds are “rolled over” tax-free into a qualified ten-year-certain deferred annuity.

Step 3. Each year for ten years, funds are dispersed from the annuity to pay the annual premium on a 10-year-pay hybrid long-term care policy.

Step 4. Annually, the policyholder receives notification of the reportable income amount for taxes.

Step 5. Once the ten years are up, the deferred annuity will be depleted, and no additional hybrid long-term care premiums will be due.

For older retirees, annual withdrawals used to pay premiums can help meet RMDs (Required Minimum Distributions).

Lower annual withdrawals spread out over ten years generally creates a reduced tax impact when compared to making a large, one-time withdrawal to fund a single-premium or lump-sum policy.

Learn more about hybrid long-term care insurance and how to “pay off” your long-term care policy in this FREE guide! 

Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance*

*Direct link!  No email or phone number required and no salesperson will call.

How to pay off your long-term care insurance with an IRA

If you are over the age of 59-1/2, it may be possible for you to buy and “pay off” your long-term care insurance with funds from your IRA.

How it works.

This approach requires the use of a hybrid long-term care insurance policy.

Hybrid long-term care insurance is an alternative to traditional long-term care insurance that combines an underlying life insurance policy or annuity with riders to cover long-term care expenses.

    • Hybrid long-term care insurance protects against long-term care expenses while simultaneously protecting insureds from the burden of a lifetime of premiums.
    • If long-term care benefits are never needed, either the death benefit of the life insurance policy or the accumulated funds of the annuity can be left to heirs.

By contrast, with traditional long-term care insurance – premiums are due for life and if care is never needed, years of costly premiums paid into the policy are lost.

5 easy steps to paying off your long-term care insurance.

At least one insurer has a program through which periodic annual premium withdrawals for hybrid long-term care insurance are coordinated through an IRA account.

Step 1. An individual or both spouses are covered by one policy.

Step 2. A portion of IRA account funds are “rolled over” tax-free into a qualified ten-year-certain deferred annuity.

Step 3. Each year for ten years, funds are dispersed from the annuity to pay the annual premium on a 10-year-pay hybrid long-term care policy.

Step 4. Annually, the policyholder receives notification of the reportable income amount for taxes.

Step 5. Once the ten years are up, the deferred annuity will be depleted, and no additional hybrid long-term care premiums will be due.

For older retirees, annual withdrawals used to pay premiums can help meet RMDs (Required Minimum Distributions).

Lower annual withdrawals spread out over ten years generally creates a reduced tax impact when compared to making a large, one-time withdrawal to fund a single-premium or lump-sum policy.

Learn more about hybrid long-term care insurance and how to “pay off” your long-term care policy in this FREE guide! 

Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance*

*Direct link – no email or phone number required and no salesperson will call.

The SECRET to getting your long-term care insurance premiums back!

Ted Stevenot.com Seabrook Island, SC

With traditional long-term care insurance, if care is never needed, years and years of premiums paid into a policy will be lost!

What’s more, policyholders must pay premiums for life – even into advanced senior age. The longer people live, the more fatigued they can become with maintaining such a policy.

Need proof?

Just ask anyone with such a policy who is now in their eighties or nineties…

But there is good news!

Hybrid long-term care insurance is an alternative to traditional long-term care insurance that helps eliminate these problems.

    • It protects against long-term care expenses while simultaneously protecting insureds from burden of lifetime premiums and the loss of premiums should care not be needed.
    • Hybrid long-term care policies function by combining an underlying life insurance policy or annuity with riders or add-on amendment(s) to cover long-term care expenses.

Lear more in this FREE Guide!  Easy direct link –  no phone number or email required and no salesperson will call:

Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance

Key features of Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance.

Hybrid long-term care insurance is a life insurance policy or annuity that includes a rider (or riders) which expand coverage to help pay for qualifying long-term care expenses.

    • In general, if you don’t end up using the policy for long-term care services, you won’t “lose” the money you put into it.
    • This is because the underlying policy will still carry out its primary function as either an annuity or a life insurance policy.
    • If benefits are never needed, either the death benefit of a life insurance policy or the accumulated funds of an annuity can be left to heirs (i.e. pre-tax accumulations from annuities are taxable to beneficiaries).

Insureds can live a long life with the peace of mind of having long-term care coverage, but without the anxiety of constantly paying premiums which they or their beneficiaries may never recover.

    • Many hybrid policies require a fixed, upfront premium to be paid, though some contracts may allow for ongoing contributions.
    • Internal funds grow on a tax-deferred basis and qualifying long-term care expenses are generally paid on a tax-advantaged basis (i.e. subject to state and federal rules).
    • At the time of writing, at least one insurer offers a policy that can be purchased jointly. This allows both individuals in a couple to benefit from coverage under a single policy.

If you are over age 59 1/2, you may be able to easily fund your policy with your IRA.

    • Depending on the contract, additional riders may be available to provide protection for inflation as well as other extended benefits.
    • Hybrid long-term care policies are medically underwritten, but some individuals may find it easier to qualify for certain types of these policies.

Learn more now!

Click for your FREE Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance.

Questions or comments? Contact me at this link.

Long-Term Care Insurance Without the Lifetime Bill

With traditional long-term care insurance, policyholders are required to pay premiums for life – even into advanced senior age. The longer people live, the more fatigued they often become with keeping up such policies.

Need proof?

Just ask anyone with such a policy who is now in their eighties or nineties.

What’s more, if no care is ever needed, years and years of policy premiums will be lost!

Hybrid long-term care insurance is an alternative to traditional long-term care insurance that helps eliminate these problems.

    • It protects against long-term care expenses while simultaneously protecting insureds from burden of lifetime premiums and the loss of premiums should care not be needed.
    • The child of two major federal laws, hybrid long-term care policies are created by combining an underlying life insurance policy or annuity with a rider or add-on amendment(s) to cover long-term care expenses.

Lear more in this FREE Guide!  Easy direct link –  no phone number or email required and no salesperson will call:

Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance

Key features of Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance.

Hybrid long-term care insurance is a life insurance policy or annuity that includes a rider (or riders) which expand coverage to help pay for qualifying long-term care expenses.

    • In general, if you don’t end up using the policy for long-term care services, you won’t “lose” the money you put into it.
    • This is because the underlying policy will still carry out its primary function as either an annuity or a life insurance policy.
    • If benefits are never needed, either the death benefit of a life insurance policy or the accumulated funds of an annuity can be left to heirs (i.e. pre-tax accumulations from annuities are taxable to beneficiaries).

Insureds can live a long life with the peace of mind of having long-term care coverage, but without the anxiety of constantly paying premiums which they or their beneficiaries may never recover.

    • Many hybrid policies require a fixed, upfront premium to be paid, though some contracts may allow for ongoing contributions.
    • Internal funds grow on a tax-deferred basis and qualifying long-term care expenses are generally paid on a tax-advantaged basis (i.e. subject to state and federal rules).
    • At the time of writing, at least one insurer offers a policy that can be purchased jointly. This allows both individuals in a couple to benefit from coverage under a single policy.

If you are over age 59 1/2, you may be able to easily fund your policy with your IRA.

    • Depending on the contract, additional riders may be available to provide protection for inflation as well as other extended benefits.
    • Hybrid long-term care policies are medically underwritten, but some individuals may find it easier to qualify for certain types of these policies.

Learn more now!

Click for your FREE Guide to Hybrid Long-Term Care Insurance.

Questions or comments? Contact me at this link.

Hacking Normal – Introduction by Ted Stevenot (John’s Dad)

John Stevenot 2018

John Stevenot came into the world on a cloudy midsummer morning in 1990.

From the start, he was a special kid. As a newborn, he had radiant blue eyes, and we wondered whether he would be lucky enough to have them keep the color. It turned out he was. How John could look at you with those eyes! It was captivating – like he could see into your soul.

As he grew, John was ahead of his age. He walked early, talked early, and was uncommonly athletic and sports minded. As a toddler, he could throw a ball (and sometimes a baby bottle) with remarkable speed and accuracy. He spent hours swishing basket after basket on his kid-size basketball hoop and, as an early preschooler, he developed the ability to swing a golf club with extraordinary grace.

Throughout his life, John gravitated toward the older kids and the adults. When we used to take miles-long treks at the beach to net blue crabs and fish in the tidal creeks and surf, John always kept up with the “big people” and never complained. In fact, far from it. He couldn’t wait to get out there and get fishing!

John was ingrained with a fiery and competitive spirit. At times, this made him a handful to raise. He used to say he hated losing far more than he enjoyed winning. This led to a few post-game drywall repairs over the years. Despite his hotblooded inclinations, his coaches always loved him. He had an intuitive ability to understand direction and strategy.

John never had to be told the play twice.

He “got it” and was always a solid contributor to any team. John carried his intensity and forward outlook into adulthood. He sought advice from mentors and respected leaders. He also read hundreds of books and consumed countless hours of instructional podcasts and videos.

As such, he avoided many of the errors in thinking from which so many people needlessly suffer. He habitually questioned the status quo and oriented himself toward the pursuit of higher truth. His most valued goal was to live life as fully as possible.

While still in college I encouraged him to learn about websites. At the time, he had an interest in “mashup” music, and he started a review site on the topic. He turned out to be a natural in the arena of digital outreach. In no time, his site was throttling my host account and racking up millions of views.

When he graduated from college with honors and a double-major in business, he could have gone to work for any number of great companies. However, I encouraged him to come back home and try to start something of his own. At the time, in addition to my regular business, I was highly involved in grassroots politics. I invited John to help where he could, and he eagerly got involved.

We went on to establish dozens of websites, reach millions and millions of people online, and collect tens of thousands of email subscribers. His early successes with online work eventually inspired John to pursue a career in digital marketing.

Years later, when I finally decided to swear off politics, John did too.

Around that same time, and again, in addition to our regular work, John and I started a commercial real estate business that we worked on together part-time. Later, we kicked off a weekly podcast on sales and marketing called, Sales Prospecting School. On the show, we discussed various ways to mix old and new-school marketing techniques for effective business development.

During his post college years, John maintained a keen interest in health and exercise. He even got me going back to the gym and in the habit of being in better shape. For several years, John was a CrossFit devotee and frequently took part in local competitions. On a late-September Saturday in 2018, John tied for his first, first-place finish in a CrossFit competition.

Later the same week, we were scheduled to record the 47th episode of our weekly podcast together. Then, without warning, symptoms, or the slightest indication of any ongoing problem, in the early hours of October 5, 2018, John died quietly in his sleep.

Just like that…he was gone.

Months later it was determined that the cause of death was an extremely rare and asymptomatic condition impacting the interior of his heart which caused it to stop.

The  posts you are about to read are based on a manuscript John completed in the summer of 2017. I remember him coming into my office and putting it on my desk soon after it was done. He said, “Well, there it is.”

I guess I was supposed to proof it for him, but I felt reluctant to do so. We had worked on writing projects together before, and I remember thinking our writing styles were quite different. I didn’t want to disturb his way of saying things.

So, I left it be.

For a variety of reasons, he never pursued taking the manuscript much beyond that point. I sometimes wonder whether he was depending on me to take it from there. If so, I let him down. It is one of my only regrets from our time together.

Sometime after he died, I got the idea to locate his manuscript and see it through into final book form. During this time, I kept our podcast running on Soundcloud. Even though there weren’t any new shows being uploaded, it continued to receive thousands of downloads.

In John’s writing, there is a directness and honesty that mirrors his personality.

Beyond a few light edits, I made every effort to leave his voice intact. At a few spots, it is not the easiest read and will require the reader’s close attention to make the most of it.

However, I find John’s raw will to assemble and confer his deepest truisms to the reader to be stirring.

Particularly powerful are his exhortations to live fully in the present because no one knows how much time he or she ultimately has.

Please enjoy the words and wisdom of this remarkable and beautiful young man! It is my sincere hope that you feel the presence of John’s spirit in these pages.

Though John’s life ended too soon, I am forever grateful for having known him. He will remain a source of pride and inspiration for me, from now and until the end of my days.

Ted Stevenot
March 2020

Two weeks before Christmas

Patricia was 85 years old and approaching her 25th year of retirement.

By every estimation, her senior years had been a terrific success – even a dream come true. In the early 1990s, she and her husband James, a successful executive for a major U.S. corporation, moved to the Eastern Seaboard to begin a long-awaited and well-deserved retirement.

Their retirement home, which had served dual-purpose in the past as an investment property and family vacation destination, was located less than a mile from the Atlantic shore amid a lush, private, and gated resort island. With an open layout and a breathtaking view of local flora and fauna – deer, wild-turkeys, foxes, bobcats, herons, egrets, ospreys, and the occasional bald eagle – the house had become a favorite gathering place for children, grandchildren, and close friends for decades.

As a retiree, Patricia had thrived.

She had grown to become a respected and influential member of her local community. She was a dedicated volunteer for her church and various non-profit causes. Much of her effort went to helping poor families, the elderly, and others in need. Wholeheartedly, she invested “time, talent, and treasure” into these cherished pursuits: raising funds, providing service, offering leadership, and devoting countless hours of personal time.

As a byproduct of this activity, she accumulated many friends and formed many close and lasting relationships. Her life was an abundance of faith, family, community, and service. Truly, she had achieved a retirement filled with joy, meaning, and deep personal fulfillment.

But, on this mid-December day, all of that was about to change.

Patricia’s husband, James, was a few years older than her. In addition to having been a successful executive, he was also a devoted husband, father, and grandfather. Like Patricia, he too had flourished in an almost storybook retirement. Taking a keen interest in golf as an early retiree, he spent many memorable hours with friends and family on the local island’s pine, oak, and palm-lined links. When not enjoying a round of golf followed by lunch at the island club, he was also a steadfast volunteer and faithful contributor to the local community. For decades, he selflessly offered up considerable executive-level management experience to a broad array of civic, religious, and non-profit endeavors.

In the first years of their retirement, James and Patricia felt confident and secure. With excellent health, a soon-to-be-paid-off family home, and well over $1,000,000 in their nest egg, the future looked bright, even sublime.

To keep watch over financial affairs, the couple hired a local investment firm from their original hometown on the recommendation of friends. The firm charged a “fee” to manage a portfolio of stocks and bonds, and to assist with the disbursement of future income. In time, their original adviser retired and passed their account on to a son who had also become a broker. Later, the firm was sold to a much larger financial institution.

Throughout a significant portion of their retirement, James and Patricia managed to have their nest egg produce well. This was true even through the bursting of the dot-com bubble of 2000–2003, and later – or at least so it seemed – through the market crash of 2008–2009.

Post-2009, however, things weren’t quite the same.

The ability to sustain their overall funds, while maintaining the income necessary to support their lifestyle, began to waver.

Growth seemed insufficient to outpace annual withdrawals for income. This anemic state continued throughout the subsequent decade of generally “upward” moving markets. Slowly, though at first almost imperceptibly, their financial foundation began to erode.

The couple did what they could to hold on. They cut back on expenses – dropping club memberships, scaling back charitable giving, holding onto aging vehicles – all the while maintaining the expectation that, someday, things might turn around. But the hoped-for recovery failed to materialize. Regardless of their collective efforts to remain frugal, their nest egg levels were becoming alarmingly low. Since James wrote the checks and handled most of the couple’s financial affairs, he was the first to see the truth head on.

Finally, in late in 2017, their retirement IRA balance fell to a critical level. And so it was, two weeks before Christmas, James was forced to break the news to Patricia.

“We have to sell the house.”

It is probably best to end this story here.

Unfortunately, for millions of people, stories like this one – or versions thereof – seem likely to become more and more common in the future.

As retirement income planning has shifted from “pension-based” models that promised guaranteed income for life to “portfolio-based” income models which offer no such guarantees, the combination of longer retirements and market volatility are putting more and more retirees at risk when it comes to sustaining financial security.

Even more unsettling is that the brunt of the impact of running out of money in retirement generally does its worst damage at later ages. At such times, it is often too late to dust off a resume and rescue oneself by going back to work.

A critical factor is that no one knows for sure how long he or she will live.

This makes it extremely difficult – if not impossible – to precisely budget funds so that your last dollar earmarked for income is spent on your last day.

Due to healthier lifestyles and improvements in medical care, people who reach older ages are now living longer than ever. Because of this, the funds people have managed to save for their retirement must be stretched over longer and longer periods of time. Further, these funds must be positioned to weather the storms destined to occur on the road ahead.

“Ruin” is the term economists use to define running out of money in retirement.

Because women on average tend to live longer than men, they face the highest risk of ruin in their senior years. Concerns about fallout due to life expectancy for women are further compounded by the fact that men often marry women several years younger than themselves.

It’s no secret that dying can be extremely expensive. Medical bills, home care, custodial care, nursing care, and other end-of-life expenses add up. As a result, the first spouse to die in many couples – more frequently, men – will inadvertently take the lion’s share of the couple’s nest egg with them when they go. When this occurs, what happens to the future security of the surviving spouse?

Beyond the physical and psychological impact of experiencing such a difficult loss, many are predicting – accurately, I think – a poverty crisis among women in the coming years.

But it doesn’t have to be this way.

I am glad to tell you that, at least in the case of James and Patricia, there was a happy ending to the story. While they did end up selling their retirement home, fortunately, they were able to do so for a satisfactory price and in a timely manner. The proceeds from the sale afforded them the resources to:

• Secure a source of guaranteed income to safeguard their financial security for life.
• Establish an emergency fund.
• Set aside a portion of funds to remain invested – thereby protecting them from inflation and helping rebuild their financial legacy.

Given the circumstances, James and Patricia were lucky. But not everyone has a resort-island beach home to sell.

What happened to James and Patricia begs two major questions:

    1. What caused their long-term financial security to eventually erode and reach a boiling point at such a delicate and vulnerable time in their lives?
    2. What safeguards could have been put in place in their planning to prevent this from happening?

It turns out, the two biggest fears for people over age 50 are whether they have saved enough for retirement and whether they will run out of money after they retire.

I am writing this blog to tell you that these fears can be overcome.

I am writing to tell you that what happened to James and Patricia can be avoided. I am writing to tell you that the danger of running out of income at a delicate and vulnerable senior age does not have to happen to you or to someone you love – and especially your surviving spouse. There are solutions to these concerns, many of which are uncomplicated, safe, reliable, and based on time-tested principles.

I am also writing to tell you that whatever your current circumstances with regard to retirement, whether you have managed to save well or whether you have found accumulating savings to be a challenge, almost any situation has the possibility of being improved.

Imagine receiving a monthly “paycheck” for life to cover your expenses while simultaneously maintaining your ability to grow wealth throughout your retirement.

Though it may seem difficult to believe, for millions of people, such a reality is within reach.

Of course, achieving success and fulfillment in retirement is about more than just money. It also requires an effort to manage other dynamic elements such as one’s mindset, expectations, and priorities.

As I write this, I am in my mid 50s and have spent the last three decades of my career in the insurance industry – particularly managing healthcare risk for businesses. While I am an active investor in securities, real estate, and various private companies, I am not a stockbroker, wealth manager, or investment “guru.” I can provide no shortcuts to “beating the market,” “hot tips,” or other get-rich-quick investment promises.

Nor would I support offering such advice.

After years of study, personal observation, and reading thousands of pages on the topic of retirement, what follows is a curation of the most important ideas I have discovered. These ideas, expressed as “18 Rules for Retirement Success,” offer solutions to the most pressing concerns for those in and nearing retirement age – especially, how to achieve lasting financial security and peace of mind.

See the sidebar at the top of this page for links to each of the 18 Rules.

If you prefer reading the rules in book form it is now available on Amazon.com.

Click to preview the book on Amazon.com

As you read the rules, be a student and not a follower.

Make sure any direction you choose is built on a foundation of your own conclusions. Only then will you take ownership of your path and obtain the necessary fortitude to see the journey through.

I offer these observations with the sincerest wish that you and those you love – including your spouse, parents, siblings, children, and friends – achieve the most successful, secure, and fulfilling retirement.

Best,

Ted Stevenot
Cincinnati, OH

Questions or comments? 

I can be reached at this link – contact Ted Stevenot.

Rule 1: Accept You Will Always Have Bills to Pay

Below is an excerpt from the book Downsize Sooner than Later – 18 Rules for Retirement Success available on Amazon.com.

Imagine your monthly bills.

Think of your gas and electric bill, cell phone, Internet, and grocery receipts. Add to that the cost of “your responsibility” for a recent medical office copay, a recent test, x-ray, or lab work. Lastly, throw in your water bill, trash bill, and monthly auto insurance – all due in the coming days. Now, imagine your checkbook. Every bill you pay, online or written out by hand, comes from your checking or other equivalent account. Take a moment, as you surely have countless times in the past, to look at the numbers.

If you’re like most people, when you review your expenses and account balances, it is as much a “feeling” as a rational assessment: “Wow, the grocery bill was higher than usual. Those out-of-town guests we hosted last weekend caused us to buy a bit more food items than we otherwise would – three extra trips to the store. Oh, and there’s that receipt from eating out on Thursday, a gasoline receipt I forgot about, and the re-charge of the Starbucks card. Wait, here’s a receipt from Amazon – no, actually two receipts, one for the leaf-blower we had to replace and the other for that graduation present we bought for our niece.”

As you account for and pay these bills, you keep your eye on your balance.

If no new money comes in to replace what you spend, the balance goes down. Sometimes, watching this happen is gut-wrenching. It causes stress, anxiety, and a sense of loss. Depending on the nature of the bills due, it can even stir up a bit of resentment.

During your working years, the remedy for such feelings is simple, if not always easy. You rely on recurring income from your paycheck to replace and refresh the funds you ultimately spend. Your paycheck is your wellspring. It is your fuel. It is your source of energy and continuing sustenance.

Ever-present at any stage of adult life is the tug-of-war between what comes “in” as income versus what goes “out” as spending.

We may try budgeting in various ways to keep our heads above water. This may take the shape of meticulous planning or the exercise of moderation. Sometimes, guilt helps us stay on track. Other times, perhaps, waves of panic.

Imagine now that you have reached retirement age. All the spending examples given above can just as easily occur in your eighties as they do in your thirties, forties or fifties. Each of these expenses is common and recurring. You may pay off a home, cars, or other expensive personal items, but there will always be certain basic expenses required to maintain your lifestyle – to take care of the things you own, keep yourself warm (or cool, depending on where you live), keep the lights on, pay for food, pay doctor bills, pay for certain types of insurance, etc.

Basic expenses never go away, regardless of your age.

Let’s repeat that…basic expenses never go away, regardless of your age.

The major difference is, as a retiree, you may have little – or substantially less – of a steady paycheck available to refresh and restore your account balances. This begs a critical question: How will you and your spouse – or your surviving spouse – derive a sustainable income stream to pay ongoing bills when you retire?

Simply dividing what you have saved by your life expectancy won’t cut it. This is because no one knows for sure how long he or she will live. What if you live substantially longer? Many imagine that by keeping the money they are not currently spending invested in anticipation of “historical average” market returns, they will be able to grow their way to sustainability. But what if markets take a dive and you end up with less money available for income than you thought?

At younger ages, your paycheck replenished your accounts and replaced the money you were inevitably forced to spend.

Is there a way to make the same thing happen when you retire? Can you secure an “income for life” that is not dependent on what happens in the markets and that promises to keep paying, regardless of how long you live?

We discuss the answers to these questions in the upcoming rules.

For now, the major point to etch into stone is to acknowledge and never forget that throughout retirement, you will always have bills to pay. This is real money that must be spent and that, once spent, will be gone forever. It cannot be re-saved, reinvested, or left to heirs.

The sustained ability to pay ongoing bills regardless of how long you live is the essence of financial security in retirement.

This fact is true for you, your spouse, your parents, and for any other person seeking financial safety and peace of mind in his or her senior years.

Questions or comments? 

I can be reached at this link – contact Ted Stevenot.

Rule 2: Don’t Spend More Than You Make

Below is an excerpt from the book Downsize Sooner than Later – 18 Rules for Retirement Success available on Amazon.com.

In the first rule, we called out the fact that certain bills will always be with us, regardless of how long we live. It is crucial to take some time and try to think about what your ongoing bills will look like when you retire. Eventually, you must compare your expected expenses in retirement to your expected sources of retirement income.

In the final analysis, your income must consistently exceed your expenses.

Otherwise – and especially in the modern era of multi-decade retirements – spending more than you make is like setting sail in a boat full of holes.

No, wait…it’s worse than that.

This is because it’s not really you in the boat. The “you” you think of today is most likely your current, strong, invincible, ready-to-face-future-challenges self. In the boat, however, is your future self. Your old-age self. And it’s also likely your old-age spouse is in the boat with you. This is a very fragile time and arguably the worst possible moment for your boat to fill with water and capsize.

Understanding the virtue of spending less than you make is easy but implementing a lifestyle that enables it is difficult.

In most financial books, this is the moment when you are given advice to gather your willpower and establish a budget. While strict budgeting is effective for some, for most others, such advice utterly fails. It is human nature that people psychologically resist being limited by a budget. Too much sacrifice. Too much discipline. Too much willpower. Too difficult to stick with over the long haul.

Complicating this fact is the chaotic nature of future expenses. As anyone responsible for managing a household’s finances knows, life throws unexpected bills your way. Anticipating these expenses in advance is extremely difficult and such expenses can kick even the most well-conceived budget into a tailspin.

I would like to suggest an alternative to strict budgeting.

I will be repeating this mechanism as a solution to various challenges presented throughout these rules. Instead of focusing on establishing a hard-and-fast budget, focus on establishing hard-and-fast routines. Some examples:

  • Grandma Jamie used to overspend on Christmas gifts for her grandchildren, but she doesn’t do that now. How? She instituted a practice of sending each grandchild a $50 bill at Christmas. Unless she gets more grandchildren, her expenses don’t go up. Her consistent routine prevents her from overspending, and she knows ahead of time exactly how much money she will need to cover her costs. The grandchildren like it too and look forward to spending their “Grandma money.”

  • Alicia and Tom enjoy eating out together but found they were spending far too much doing so each month. So, rather than go out on Friday evenings to someplace costly, they found a favorite restaurant they like for breakfast on Friday mornings. They split a big-breakfast menu item between the two of them. They enjoy the food, the atmosphere, and the time they spend together. When the bill comes, it is a fraction of what they would otherwise have spent. Their “date morning out” is something they look forward to each week, and it is aligned with their long-term goal not to overspend.

  • Jane and Allen were discussing how, while they enjoyed traveling to out-of-town locations for weekend trips, it was proving rather costly. They observed that they spent little time focusing on fun things they could do together close to home. They began searching for attractions of interest locally. Something that stood out was the community bike trail. For exercise in the evenings, they started taking short walks along the trail. Formerly a railroad line, the trail cuts through some of the most beautiful scenic woods in their area. Eventually, they bought bikes and became regular riders on the trail – biking as often as five times a week! These outings help them stay in shape, afford them quality time together, and provide hours of enjoyment at virtually zero cost.

I could go on for days with examples like these. They embody a big secret that many people fail to understand. Spending less is more about living intentionally and building properly aligned routines than it is about willpower and sacrifice. While willpower does play a small role in the beginning, it is the spark and not the engine. The same goes for other areas we will be discussing such as health, diet, exercise, finding more quality time to spend with loved ones, successful investing, and more.

Expressed as formulas:

• Best intended budget + same old routine = failure.
• New and better routine + time = success!

What are your priorities and how are they reflected in your daily lifestyle?

Do you want to achieve optimal body weight, but your hobby is watching cooking shows and baking sugary cakes and cookies? Do you want to drink less, but spend your weekend nights with friends who always seem to end up at the bourbon and cigar bar? Do you want to improve your professional skills through reading, but spend evenings binge-watching crime shows?

If so, the actions you are taking regularly – your routines – are out of alignment with your long-term goals. Without a change in lifestyle, it will be extremely difficult to get what you want.

If you would like to spend less, you must construct a daily way of living that is in alignment with that goal. The prime movers are not “limits,” “deprivation,” “willpower,” “sacrifice,” or even “discipline.” Instead, success is derived from words such as “deliberate,” “intentional,” “designed,” “aligned,” and “consistent.”

As an exercise, take a moment to list the things on which you spend money.

Highlight the items that make you cringe because either you resent the expense, or you feel they are costing you more than you want to spend. Especially, list ongoing monthly expenses that exceed $300 per month.

Note that every $300 per month in expenses during a 25–30 year retirement will cost you roughly $100,000. Does a regular expense come in at $600 per month? That’s $200,000.

Decide if these expenses are worth the cost. From there, brainstorm lifestyle changes that are consistent with your values and goals that would help you eliminate or substantially reduce such ongoing expenditures.

Questions or comments? 

I can be reached at this link – contact Ted Stevenot.

Rule 3: Downsize Sooner Than Later

Ted and Jan Stevenot walking on the beach at Seabrook Island in 2018

Below is the third rule and title chapter of the book, Downsize Sooner Than Later – 18 Rules for Retirement Success, available on Amazon.com.

Let’s kick off this rule with a brief story.

Anna is in her early eighties and lost her husband to cancer a few years ago. When she and her husband retired in their mid-60s, the couple decided to continue living in their long-time family home. The house is a five-bedroom two-story in an upper-middle-class neighborhood, bordering one of America’s largest cities.

Anna and her husband paid off their mortgage soon after they retired.

The house, beyond serving as a place to host occasional holiday gatherings, is significantly larger than the two of them needed for retirement. With over 3,000 square feet above ground and a large finished lower level, it requires two central air conditioning systems to keep cool in summer and two gas furnaces to stay warm in winter.

During their retired years, the couple perceived the house to be “outdated.” They embarked on several major and costly renovation projects including replacing windows, residing, re-roofing, and adding a four-season sun-room.

Beyond the renovations, given the home’s upscale location, the house demands constant external maintenance – lawn mowing, fertilizing, weeding, edging, trimming, mulching, planting of annuals, pruning, leaf removal, snow removal, etc.

Amidst her husband’s illness and since his passing, Anna has had to shoulder the responsibility for all the ongoing maintenance and upkeep.

This has added significant physical, emotional, and financial stress to her life as she has felt pressure to hold things together. As a result of being physically unable to do much of the work, Anna is forced to rely on a merry-go-round of outside contractors – many strangers, some ethical, others less so – to help keep things in shape. It seems something is always breaking down. Since her husband’s passing, Anna has had to replace a dishwasher, refrigerator, garage door-opener, fix a roof leak in the garage, and now one of the two air conditioners is acting up.

Trapped between the uncertainty of the future and the desire to remain connected with the past, Anna is stuck and miserable.

The house is far too much to manage, but it is difficult for her to walk away from her family home all by herself. This would mean letting go of many of her valued keepsakes and venturing into the unknown. She is yet to clear out her husband’s things since his passing – ties, suits, shoes, undershirts, socks, etc. But she has not found the will to do so. The added stress of keeping up a large high-maintenance home hasn’t helped.

Had the couple opted for a simpler lifestyle earlier on, Anna would not be facing so many difficult decisions by herself and as a grieving and stressed widow.

I am certain had her husband foreseen the circumstances she was going to be in after he died, he would have opted for an alternative course. They could have arranged as a couple for the inevitable day in which one of them was left to face the future alone. They could have made the tough decisions together about what to keep, what to discard, where to live, and how to simplify.

As Anna’s story demonstrates, the sooner the decision is made to downsize, the sooner one can have fewer worries, less complication, and become accustomed to a lifestyle that is more sustainable in the future. Downsizing also brings the bonus of lower recurring expenses for things like property taxes, utilities, upkeep, furnishings, and more.

For most retirees, lowering expenses sooner rather than later opens the door to additional long-term savings and makes affording a more enjoyable retirement lifestyle easier. In some parts of the country, it may make sense not only to downsize, but to move to a less costly location – even to another state – with a lower cost of living.

Downsizing early means being intentional about where you are headed.

It protects you from allowing inertia from the status quo to cause unnecessary future stress and expense. It avoids leaving a grieving spouse to grapple with heart-wrenching decisions about what to do with a couple’s lifetime of possessions all alone. Given the choice, make these hard decisions together and earlier when you can think clearly and are not under major stress.

Here is a list of potential “downsize-able” expenses that can weigh heavily in retirement.

    • A large home.
    • Multiple homes.
    • High maintenance/expense automobiles.
    • High maintenance/expense possessions (boats, RVs, timeshares, vacation homes, rental properties).
    • Club memberships.
    • Extensive collections and hobby-related items.

Whether you decide to keep an item, let it go now, or make plans to let it go later, is a matter of personal preference.

If you do keep an item, make sure it is a conscious decision rather than driven by inertia. Add to your considerations how you or your surviving spouse will manage high maintenance items should one of you be left facing the future alone.

Questions or comments? 

I can be reached at this link – contact Ted Stevenot.

Rule 4: Know what to rent and what to own.

Below is an excerpt from the book Downsize Sooner than Later – 18 Rules for Retirement Success available on Amazon.com.

An important subcategory of controlling long-term expenses in retirement relates to the question of whether to rent certain possessions or to own them outright.

It could be you identify certain items you enjoy very much, but that are expensive and high maintenance. These items may not be conducive to long-term ownership during your retirement years.

One potential answer that enables you to still enjoy certain possessions is to “rent versus own.”

Things to Rent Versus Own

Some examples of things that can fit this category are motorboats, sailboats, campers, RVs, racing cars, sports cars, off-road vehicles, golf carts, ATVs, jet-skis, wet-bikes, vacation property (non-income producing), time-shares, sports gear (snow skis, water skis, diving equipment), expensive part-time hobby items and equipment, horses/tack, etc.

Consider the following examples, illustrating the upside of renting versus owning:

    • Alex and his son love to four-wheel drive. Rather than purchase a trailer (and insure, maintain, and license the trailer), store, maintain, and insure ATV equipment of their own, they have found a nearby recreational vehicle park from which they can rent ATVs when they feel the urge to go off-road. This costs them a fraction of the price of ownership and is far less hassle. When they finish a weekend trip, they simply hand the keys back to the park office and say, “Thanks!”

    • Glenda and Bill love to travel the country to visit America’s many national parks and monuments. Rather than own a large RV with its costs for purchase, licensing, depreciation, maintenance, storage, and insurance, the couple deploys a mixed strategy of renting SUVs and using an app which helps them discover surplus hotel rooms at discounts near the attractions they wish to visit. This approach offers them a great deal of variety, lower stress, and they have stayed in many interesting places over the years all for substantially less cost and effort.

    • Edna and George developed a love of boating on America’s ocean inlets connected to the Inter-coastal Waterway. It started on their honeymoon, when they were invited to a day of sailing and became hooked on the gentle breezes and marsh views. They researched owning a boat of their own and were surprised by the accumulated costs of purchasing, trailering, insuring, licensing, maintaining, fueling and storing a modest saltwater-capable boat. Today, when the couple gets the urge to cruise the waterway, they use a rental service. It is just as enjoyable, ends up being a fraction of the cost of owning, and is essentially worry-free.

We see with these examples that success is not about willful deprivation or forgoing the things you love. Instead, it is about objective and design. Of course, there are some things that can be owned affordably, and the point isn’t to purge your life of all possessions. 

Rather, the point is,

Be intentional about what you own and what you are willing to pay.

If it is possible to find equal or greater value without the cost of ownership, renting can offer a win-win over the long haul.

Things to Own Versus Rent

Here we see that the reverse of the above idea can also be true. There are at least two items you should consider owning outright for the long haul. These are:

    1. A smaller, nicer home.
    2. At least one reliable vehicle.

The reason these items are candidates for ownership is that they have the potential to be necessities over the long-term.

If you own these items in an affordable and deliberate way, you can end up saving yourself expense over time, and you can limit your physical and emotional stress.

For many people, a “smaller nicer home” may mean a house, garden home or condominium with no more than two or three bedrooms. This would be a home that is updated – newer roof, windows, HVAC, and appliances – that demands reduced overall operational expense.

There is an upscale community near where I live in which the home values frequently run into the multi-millions. Close by, a developer put in condominiums that meet the criteria of “smaller and nicer.”

Most are two-bedroom units, some with offices and they are gorgeously appointed. There is an association fee, but for most residents, the fee is a fraction of what their prior costs were for maintenance and upkeep of much larger, more elaborate homes.

Imagine: no mortgage, no lawn to mow, no snow to shovel, no mulch to sling, no weeds to pull, no roofs to repair, etc.

When you want to take an out-of-town trip, set the alarm, lock the front door, and hit the road. Simple. Easy. Uncomplicated. Low cost and, for the most part, worry-free.

Of course, this is an ideal example and the people who use it have the means to do so, but the underlying concept can be applied across a broad spectrum of economic circumstances.

For many, an updated one or two-bedroom ranch house with a smaller yard and a single floor of living space may work out well.

The goal is comfortable, paid-for, low-cost, low-maintenance, and sustainable.

When it comes to vehicles, the same strategy applies. Depending on where you live, you may always need at least one reliable car for daily living. As I write this, the workhorse for my family – the vehicle that goes to doctor appointments, the grocery store, the office, for short out-of-town trips, and is our “daily driver” – is a reliable and highly-rated SUV.

While comfortable and nice, it is not a high-cost, high-maintenance, or high-status brand. Being more common, it is less costly to own, less costly to insure, and less costly to maintain.

In some instances, it may make sense to rent (i.e. lease) a vehicle or a home at a late stage of retirement.

This could be to achieve a living environment with virtually no maintenance and worry. However, if you intend to rent such critical items, the income required to pay the rent must be rock-solid.

You want to know for sure that you can keep a worry-free roof over your head for as long as you and your spouse will need it. Going broke paying high rent, only to end up without a home, is the opposite of security.

Depending on your finances, there is room to be creative, but keep the underlying goal of paid-for, low-cost, simple, and sustainable.

A few additional examples:

    • June lost her husband five years ago. The two of them had retired to a smaller home in Florida, in which they spent many enjoyable years before her husband’s passing. June has two sons living in the Midwest, in homes with extra space. June sold her Florida home and now alternates living in the extra bedrooms of her sons’ homes. She is super-easy to get along with and poses the boys no trouble. June recently paid cash for a small, newer, reliable SUV she uses to get around town. She has reinvested the proceeds from the sale of her prior home and these funds continue to compound. Every year, she takes the boys and their wives on a vacation trip, for which she pays. Her life is inexpensive, low-stress, and spent in the company of people she deeply loves. To top it off, every year, her wealth and future legacy continue to grow.

    • Alex and Mara sold their family home in their upper 80s and moved into a garden-home style rental community designed for people over the age of 50. They use a combination of guaranteed lifetime income sources – not dependent on the stock market – to more than meet their monthly rent and expenses. The absence of stairs has made it much easier for Alex to get around than in their prior home. Free from worry about maintenance and upkeep, the couple has more time and energy to focus on reading, volunteering, and enjoying time with their children, grandchildren, and great grandchildren.

    • Jane and Orville sold their family home in early retirement and purchased a comfortable two-bedroom condominium with cash from the proceeds. They have one reliable car that acts as a daily-driver, and they keep their living expenses low. The couple’s combined Social Security income and minimal pensions far exceed their monthly bills. Due to their smart lifestyle choices, the couple has continued to contribute to their long-term savings. This increases their security and adds to their future legacy. Feeling far from limited by their lifestyle, they both love reading biographies – which they check out from the local library – watching tennis via digital stream, and spending quality time with their children and grandchildren.

Questions or comments? 

I can be reached at this link – contact Ted Stevenot.

Rule 5: Separate Your Income from Your Wealth

Below is an excerpt from the book, Downsize Sooner Than Later – 18 Rules for Retirement Success, available on Amazon.com.

So far, we have discussed the inevitability of ongoing bills and controlling expenses by living intentionally, with an emphasis on lifestyle and routine as keys to retirement success. In this rule, we begin introducing the topics of retirement finances and investing.

I remember, when helping my mother arrange her financial affairs as a senior, she once said to me, “Ted, I just don’t understand financial things.”

I responded in somewhat the same way she used to respond to me when I was frustrated by schoolwork as a child. I said, kindly, but pointedly,

“No. You must not say that. You are a smart and capable person. And you are fully able to learn about and understand the important fundamentals of your finances.”

In the end, she was able to understand, and this deeper knowledge opened the door to a peace of mind which made the effort to acquire the information worthwhile.

Some of what I am about to explain flies in the face of conventional wisdom.

But give it a hearing. I initially struggled to be open to some of these concepts and had to fight with what “everyone else” seemed to be saying, as well.

Conventional wisdom says, “A person should save and invest an entire working career until, one day, he or she can retire and live happily ever after on the funds from an accumulated nest egg.”

The underlying assumption is that income will be withdrawn as needed from the nest egg while, simultaneously, funds not used for current income will be reinvested over time. Following this “portfolio-based” construct, there should be enough funds to afford a happy retirement, along with a generous balance left over for legacy (i.e. money for the next generation and/or for charity).

If you’ve never heard it said before, there are several serious issues with this popular vision.

The biggest issue stems from the fact that because critical underlying funds necessary for future income remain invested, they remain exposed to risk over time. These underlying funds often establish the core of what you will need to achieve long-term security in retirement. If you lose them, you will be in a very difficult situation.

The financial industry is aware of this concern and recommends the remedies of “asset allocation” and “diversification” as mechanisms for safeguarding future nest egg dollars.

    • Asset allocation refers to owning different types or classes of assets as a means of spreading risk. Stocks, bonds, real estate, and commodities are all different asset classes. Theoretically, when one asset class goes down in value, the other asset classes may or may not simultaneously experience similar declines.
    • Diversification is the strategy of spreading risk across investments within the same asset class. For example, owning one company’s stock is considered riskier than owning shares in a fund that owns stock in many companies from a variety of industries.

The fundamental difficulty remains that even after re-balancing a nest egg to allegedly “safer” asset classes, these assets are still investments and often pose very real and unique risks of their own. Bonds, for example, are often considered a haven. However, bonds possess the risk of going down in market value as interest rates go up. This is critically important to know, as interest rates hover near historic lows. Where will rates be in 15, 20, or 30 years? If rates go up substantially, how will this impact the underlying value and availability of such funds as sources for reliable income in the future?

Further, just because nest egg dollars are allocated to different asset classes offers no guarantee they will act independently from one another other during a downturn. It is entirely possible that bonds, stocks, and real estate may all decrease in value at the exact same moment in time.

For now, I want you to imagine a different path forward.

With this path, individuals save and invest their entire working careers as before, but when they retire, they split their nest egg into two baskets. The first basket is used to fund income, and the second is set aside to remain invested and undisturbed.

In the coming rules, we will break down in more detail what happens with each basket. The important goal here is to understand that this separation is key and serves two game-changing purposes.

1. Income: The first basket is used to establish guaranteed income to cover basic living expenses. This is income that never runs out, no matter how long you live, and that is not dependent on what happens in future investment markets.
2. Wealth: The second basket is used to establish a fund that stays invested and undisturbed throughout your retirement. Because the funds in this basket are not required to fund income, they are better positioned to ride out future market storms and can more safely benefit from compounded growth.

This simple foundational shift opens the door to solving several major problems in the modern retirement era. 

In this blog’s opening story, it would have not only kept James and Patricia from running out of income late in retirement, but, based on historical market records, it would have left them a surplus of millions in invested assets.

Of course, everyone’s circumstances are different and what happened in the past is no guarantee of what will happen in the future. However, success – and failure – leave clues.

The fundamental concept of splitting funds into separate income and wealth baskets can be applied successfully across a wide variety of situations. Whether you have saved a little or a lot, there is substantial opportunity for almost anyone to achieve lasting retirement income security, grow invested savings over time, and acquire greater overall peace of mind.

Questions or comments? 

I can be reached at this link – contact Ted Stevenot.